🔗 Share this article

Australia's controversial action to restrict social networking access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate around the globe. Politicians, campaigners, and parents are observing intently to see if this approach will become a template for other nations.

Across Europe Momentum

Throughout Europe, a increasing number of nations are exploring parallel bans.

• Denmark plans a restriction on social media for under-15s, with the PM stating that mobile devices and platforms are "robbing our youngsters' childhood". Legislation could be passed next year.
• Norway is set to implement a minimum age limit of 15, citing the need to shield the young from the "manipulative force of the AI".
• The Irish government is working on a digital ID system to verify the age and identity of social media users. The media minister have indicated that an Australian-model ban could be "an measures in reserve".
• In Spain, the leader has asked the legislature to pass a law increasing the access age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has threatened a ban for those under fifteen, and a government panel has endorsed a comparable move, including an overnight "digital curfew" for older teenagers.
• The government in The Dutch government has recommended families to restrict their children from social media up to the age of 15.

At the EU level, the EU parliament has adopted a symbolic statement demanding a ban for minors except if guardian approval is granted. Although it cautions of the "habit-forming" nature of these apps, the move does not create enforceable legislation.

"A clear age restriction is a useful foundation," stated one MEP driving the resolution.

The United Kingdom: A Watchful Stance

In the UK, the leadership has kept open a potential ban, stating that "nothing is discarded" but insisting any action must be "based on strong data".

Last year, momentum grew behind a bill to introduce limits on social media use by minors, but it was ultimately modified. Nonetheless, the government committed to conduct more studies the matter.

Campaign organizations have raised apprehensions. An organization set up by the relatives of a teenager who took her own life after being exposed to harmful online content argues that a blanket age ban may not protect children and could result in a "cliff edge" of risk when users become eligible.

"This ban is a answer to the refusal of the Silicon Valley to design products and services that are secure and suitable for minors," commented a prominent online safety campaigner.

America: A Fragmented Approach

Across America, action is primarily occurring at the local level amid federal stalemate.

• Utah demands adult approval for under-18s to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• The state of Florida has passed a measure prohibiting children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it is subject to legal challenges.
• The state of Virginia has approved a regulation limiting under-16s to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with any further use dependent on parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly passed measures mandating parental consent for teenagers to open social media accounts.

Even with bipartisan support and calls from certain individuals to follow Australia's path, a US-wide ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Outlook

Beyond Europe and the US, other nations are similarly considering moves.

• Malaysia intends to prohibit social media for under-16s beginning next year.
• Brazil has raised the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

But, international bodies take a more measured position. Unicef has cautioned that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "may even prove counterproductive". The organization points out that the internet can be a "vital connection" for isolated children and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to prioritize child safeguards.

Even as this worldwide conversation continues, the steps of Australia and others indicate that policymakers around the world are less and less content to stand by for tech companies to act voluntarily.